|
Daniela Rato, M. O., Victor Santos, Manuel Gomes & Angel Sappa. (2022). A Sensor-to-Pattern Calibration Framework for Multi-Modal Industrial Collaborative Cells. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 64, pp. 497–507.
|
|
|
Pereira J., M. M. & W. A. (2021). Qualitative Model to Maximize Shrimp Growth at Low Cost. 5th Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM 2021), Octubre 12 – 15, .
|
|
|
Xavier Soria, G. P. - J. & A. S. (2022). LDC: Lightweight Dense CNN for Edge Detection. IEEE Access journal, Vol. 10, pp. 68281–68290.
|
|
|
Ulises Gildardo Quiroz Antúnez, A. I. M. R., María Fernanda Calderón Vega, Adán Guillermo Ramírez García. (2022). APTITUDE OF COFFEE (COFFEA ARABICA L.) AND CACAO (THEOBROMA CACAO L.) CROPS CONSIDERING CLIMATE CHANGE. Granja, Vol. 36(Issue 2).
|
|
|
Armin Mehri, Parichehr Behjati, & Angel Domingo Sappa. (2023). TnTViT-G: Transformer in Transformer Network for Guidance Super Resolution. IEEE Access, Vol. 11.
|
|
|
Xavier Soria, A. S., Patricio Humanante, Arash Akbarinia. (2023). Dense extreme inception network for edge detection. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 139.
|
|
|
Abel Rubio, W. A., Leandro González & Jonathan Aviles-Cedeno. (2023). Distributed Intelligence in Autonomous PEM Fuel Cell Control. Energies 2023, Vol. 16(Issue 12).
|
|
|
Patricia Súarez, H. V., Dario Carpio & Angel Sappa. (2023). Corn Kernel Classification From Few Training Samples. In journal Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, Vol. 9, pp. 89–99.
|
|
|
Armin Mehri, P. B., Dario Carpio, and Angel D. Sappa. (2023). SRFormer: Efficient Yet Powerful Transformer Network For Single Image Super Resolution. IEEE access, Vol. 11, 121457–121469.
|
|
|
Mónica Villavicencio, & Alain Abran. (2011). Facts and Perceptions Regarding Software Measurement in Education and in Practice: Preliminary Results. Journal of Software Engineering and Application, , pp. 227–234.
Abstract: How is software measurement addressed in undergraduate and graduate programs in universities? Do organizations consider that the graduating students they hire have an adequate knowledge of software measurement? To answer these and related questions, a survey was administered to participants who attended the IWSM-MENSURA 2010 conference in Stuttgart, Germany. Forty-seven of the 69 conference participants (including software development practitioners, software measurement consultants, university professors, and graduate students) took part in the survey. The results indicate that software measurement topics are: A) covered mostly at the graduate level and not at the undergraduate level, and B) not mandatory. Graduate students and professors consider that, of the measurement topics covered in university curricula, specific topics, such as measures for the requirements phase, and measurement techniques and tools, receive more attention in the academic context. A common observation of the practitioners who participated in the survey was that students hired as new employees bring limited software measurement-related knowledge to their organizations. Discussion of the findings and directions for future research are presented.
|
|