|
|
Luis Chuquimarca, B. V. & S. V. (2024). A Review of External Quality Inspection for Fruit Grading using CNN Models (Vol. Vol. 14).
|
|
|
|
Rato D., O. M., Santos V., Sappa A. & Raducanu B. (2024). Multi-View 2D to 3D Lifting Video-Based Optimization: A Robust Approach for Human Pose Estimation with Occluded Joint Prediction. IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Abu Dhabi, October 14-18, 2024, .
|
|
|
|
Patricia Suarez & Angel D. Sappa. (2025). Synthetic Thermal Image Generation from Multi-Cue Input Data. 20th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP 2025), .
|
|
|
|
Gisel Bastidas G., P. M. V., Boris Vintimilla & Angel D. Sappa. (2025). Application-Guided Image Fusion: A Path to Improve Results in High-Level Vision Tasks. 20th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications VISAPP 2025, .
|
|
|
|
Henry O. Velesaca, A. D. S. & J. A. H. (2025). A Case Study of Anomaly Detection in Tinplate Lids: Supervised vs Unsupervised approaches. 11th International Conference on Automation, Robotics, and Applications (ICARA 2025), .
|
|
|
|
Henry O. Velesaca & Angel D. Sappa. (2025). Seeing the Unseen: AI-Powered Camouflaged Pest Detection. 9th International Conference on Machine Vision and Information Technology (CMVIT 2025), .
|
|
|
|
Constantine Macías A., T. P. A., Realpe Miguel, Suárez Moncada Jenifer, Páez Rosas Diego & Jarrín Enrique Peláez. (2024). Leveraging Deep Learning Techniques for Marine and Coastal Wildlife Using Instance Segmentation: A Study on Galápagos Sea Lions. In 8th Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM 2024) Cuenca, October 15 – October 18, 2024, .
|
|
|
|
Leo Thomas Ramos & Angel D. Sappa. (2025). Leveraging U-Net and selective feature extraction for land cover classification using remote sensing imagery. Scientific Reports, .
|
|
|
|
Mónica Villavicencio, & Alain Abran. (2011). Facts and Perceptions Regarding Software Measurement in Education and in Practice: Preliminary Results. Journal of Software Engineering and Application, , pp. 227–234.
Abstract: How is software measurement addressed in undergraduate and graduate programs in universities? Do organizations consider that the graduating students they hire have an adequate knowledge of software measurement? To answer these and related questions, a survey was administered to participants who attended the IWSM-MENSURA 2010 conference in Stuttgart, Germany. Forty-seven of the 69 conference participants (including software development practitioners, software measurement consultants, university professors, and graduate students) took part in the survey. The results indicate that software measurement topics are: A) covered mostly at the graduate level and not at the undergraduate level, and B) not mandatory. Graduate students and professors consider that, of the measurement topics covered in university curricula, specific topics, such as measures for the requirements phase, and measurement techniques and tools, receive more attention in the academic context. A common observation of the practitioners who participated in the survey was that students hired as new employees bring limited software measurement-related knowledge to their organizations. Discussion of the findings and directions for future research are presented.
|
|
|
|
Carlos Monsalve, & Alain April and Alain Abran. (2011). Measuring software functional size from business process models. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 21, pp. 311–338.
Abstract: ISO 14143-1 specifies that a functional size measurement (FSM) method must provide measurement procedures to quantify the functional user requirements (FURs) of software. Such quantitative information, functional size, is typically used, for instance, in software estimation. One of the international standards for FSM is the COSMIC FSM method — ISO 19761 — which was designed to be applied both to the business application (BA) software domain and to the real-time software domain. A recurrent problem in FSM is the availability and quality of the inputs required for measurement purposes; that is, well documented FURs. Business process (BP) models, as they are commonly used to gather requirements from the early stages of a project, could be a valuable source of information for FSM. In a previous article, the feasibility of such an approach for the BA domain was analyzed using the Qualigram BP modeling notation. This paper complements that work by: (1) analyzing the use of BPMN for FSM in the BA domain; (2) presenting notation-independent guidelines for the BA domain; and (3) analyzing the possibility of using BP models to perform FSM in the real-time domain. The measurement results obtained from BP models are compared with those of previous FSM case studies.
|
|
