|
Marjorie Chalen, & Boris X. Vintimilla. (2019). Towards Action Prediction Applying Deep Learning. Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI); Guayaquil, Ecuador; 11-15 Noviembre 2019, , pp. 1–3.
Abstract: Considering the incremental development future action prediction by video analysis task of computer vision where it is done based upon incomplete action executions. Deep learning is playing an important role in this task framework. Thus, this paper describes recently techniques and pertinent datasets utilized in human action prediction task.
|
|
|
Ma. Paz Velarde, Erika Perugachi, Dennis G. Romero, Ángel D. Sappa, & Boris X. Vintimilla. (2015). Análisis del movimiento de las extremidades superiores aplicado a la rehabilitación física de una persona usando técnicas de visión artificial. Revista Tecnológica ESPOL-RTE, Vol. 28, pp. 1–7.
Abstract: Comúnmente durante la rehabilitación física, el diagnóstico dado por el especialista se basa en observaciones cualitativas que sugieren, en algunos casos, conclusiones subjetivas. El presente trabajo propone un enfoque cuantitativo, orientado a servir de ayuda a fisioterapeutas, a través de una herramienta interactiva y de bajo costo que permite medir los movimientos de miembros superiores. Estos movimientos son capturados por un sensor RGB-D y procesados mediante la metodología propuesta, dando como resultado una eficiente representación de movimientos, permitiendo la evaluación cuantitativa de movimientos de los miembros superiores.
|
|
|
Lukas Danev, Marten Hamann, Nicolas Fricke, Tobias Hollarek, & Dennys Paillacho. (2017). Development of animated facial expression to express emotions in a robot: RobotIcon. In IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapter Meeting (ETCM) (Vol. 2017-January, pp. 1–6).
|
|
|
Luis Chuquimarca, R. P., Paula Gonzalez, Boris Vintimilla & Sergio Velastin. (2023). Fruit defect detection using CNN models with real and virtual data. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications VISIGRAPP 2023 (pp. 272–279).
|
|
|
Luis Chuquimarca, B. X. V. & S. V. (2024). Classifying Healthy and Defective Fruits with a Siamese Architecture and CNN Models. In Accepted in 14th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems (ICPRS).
|
|
|
Luis Chuquimarca, B. V. & S. V. (2023). Banana Ripeness Level Classification using a Simple CNN Model Trained with Real and Synthetic Datasets. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications VISIGRAPP 2023 (pp. 536–543).
|
|
|
Luis C. Herrera, L. del R. L., Nayeth I. Solorzano, Jonathan S. Paillacho & Dennys Paillacho. (2021). Metrics Design of Usability and Behavior Analysis of a Human-Robot-Game Platform. In The 2nd International Conference on Applied Technologies (ICAT 2020), diciembre 2-4. Communication in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 1388, pp. 164–178).
|
|
|
Low S., I. N., Nina O., Sappa A. and Blasch E. (2022). Multi-modal Aerial View Object Classification Challenge Results-PBVS 2022. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, (CVPRW 2022), junio 19-24. (Vol. 2022-June, pp. 417–425).
Abstract: This paper details the results and main findings of the
second iteration of the Multi-modal Aerial View Object
Classification (MAVOC) challenge. This year’s MAVOC
challenge is the second iteration. The primary goal of
both MAVOC challenges is to inspire research into methods for building recognition models that utilize both synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and electro-optical (EO) input
modalities. Teams are encouraged/challenged to develop
multi-modal approaches that incorporate complementary
information from both domains. While the 2021 challenge
showed a proof of concept that both modalities could be
used together, the 2022 challenge focuses on the detailed
multi-modal models. Using the same UNIfied COincident
Optical and Radar for recognitioN (UNICORN) dataset and
competition format that was used in 2021. Specifically, the
challenge focuses on two techniques, (1) SAR classification
and (2) SAR + EO classification. The bulk of this document is dedicated to discussing the top performing methods
and describing their performance on our blind test set. Notably, all of the top ten teams outperform our baseline. For
SAR classification, the top team showed a 129% improvement over our baseline and an 8% average improvement
from the 2021 winner. The top team for SAR + EO classification shows a 165% improvement with a 32% average
improvement over 2021.
|
|
|
Juca Aulestia M., L. J. M., Guaman Quinche J., Coronel Romero E., Chamba Eras L., & Roberto Jacome Galarza. (2020). Open innovation at university: a systematic literature review. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1159 AISC, 2020, 3–14.
|
|
|
Juan A. Carvajal, Dennis G. Romero, & Angel D. Sappa. (2017). Fine-tuning deep convolutional networks for lepidopterous genus recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10125 LNCS, pp. 467–475.
|
|